🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and parents are watching intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

European Movement

Throughout Europe, a increasing chorus of nations are exploring comparable restrictions.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that smartphones and networks are "taking away our kids' youth". The policy is expected to be passed soon.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to protect the young from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the identity and age of social media users. Officials have stated that an similar ban could be "a potential tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to enact a bill increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a related action, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has advised families to block their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic statement demanding a ban for minors without guardian approval is granted. Even though it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these platforms, the step does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a useful first step," commented the European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by robust research".

Previously, support built behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually watered down. However, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised warnings. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous online content contends that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to design platforms and apps that are safe and fit for minors," commented a influential peer.

America: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, action is primarily occurring at the state level due to national gridlock.

• Utah demands guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has signed a measure barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law restricting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with extra access needing adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise enacted bills demanding guardian approval for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from certain politicians to copy this path, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Beyond these regions, additional countries are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, world bodies take a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "may even backfire". The organization notes that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide conversation continues, the policies of Australia and several other countries show that governments around the world are increasingly willing to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.